Review Topic - Creating Environmental Improvements
through Restoration
For the purposes of this review, restoration has been defined
as the reclamation, rehabilitation or re-integration of an
aggregate quarry to a positive after use. Restoration covers all
stages of the rehabilitation process from start to finish:
planning, consultation and assessment; investigation; design;
implementation; and management stages.
Quarry restoration often involves creating a new landform that
affects the visual impact and landscape character of the site.
It always gives rise to changes in the ground and ground surface
that provide a new context for the site in terms of the other
major elements of the post-closure environmental footprint:
water, biodiversity, and geodiversity. These changes may provide
opportunities for a range of after-uses, and challenges to be
overcome (such as long term site safety if public access is
contemplated). It may be possible to establish some elements of
the new environmental footprint progressively (as excavation
proceeds) and, even where progressive restoration is not an
option, there are a number of techniques of temporary
restoration that can limit landscape and visual impacts during
the life of a quarry.
Numerous ALSF projects were relevant to this review. However,
many of the site specific projects funded by Natural England and
English Heritage were of a practical nature and were not written
up in report format, so just forty reports were included in the
review.
The projects cover issues and techniques relating to restoration
at each of the quarry life-cycle phases (planning and design,
operational, and post-closure).
Planning and design phase
The need for quarry restoration to be planned from the outset
(and continually reviewed throughout the operational phase and
again before the final restoration is implemented) is recognised
by many of the ALSF reports. Some cover the legislative
framework while others consider the planning and design process,
including the technical aspects. Stakeholder involvement is
emphasised frequently.
Restoration both incorporates mitigation measures relating to
elements of the environmental footprint of quarrying and can be
used in its own right as a mitigation measure. It is thus an
essential consideration in quarry design and environmental
assessment at the planning stage of the quarry life-cycle. ALSF
reports consider a number of specific technical aspects of
restoration as a mitigation measure, including: water-based
restoration; visual screening; resolving conflicts with
aviation; creating secure and sustainable final slopes; and
enabling stakeholder communities to visualise future restored
quarry landscapes. Many reports emphasise the role restored
quarries can play in the promotion of educational, cultural,
ecological and geological objectives.
Operational phase
Virtually all the ALSF reports provide some useful
information on the preparation and enablement of
restoration during and/or at the end of the operational
stage of the quarry life-cycle. Restoration approaches
suitable for non-agricultural uses are considered, while
other projects cover matters such as spoil remediation
or special blasting techniques for producing safe faces
and slopes. The topic of quarry “wet” areas and their
restoration is researched, with good advice and
recommendations. The subjects of art/culture and science
have been addressed by some reports, considering the
educational and cultural opportunities a quarry
restoration can provide. Some projects which had a focus
on training included aspects of restoration.

A few reports considered the benefits of progressive
restoration techniques. These are particularly
achievable in sand and gravel quarries but also in some
hard-rock operations where the deposit is to be worked
in phases or upper slopes can be restored as the quarry
is deepened. Progressive restoration requires a lot of
pre-planning, investigation, preparation and management.
This is ideally achieved through an integrated quarry
design process that balances the commercial objectives
of the quarry with its environmental impact and the
safety and operational issues that arise. In many cases,
progressive restoration may mitigate negative impacts
and reassure stakeholders. In some sites, it also
presents the opportunity to release completed areas for
a beneficial after-use (subject to safety and
environmental considerations associated with the
proximity of ongoing working).
Post-closure phase
Final restoration is comprehensively covered by all
the reports reviewed, with some suggesting innovative
uses. These include Arts/Sculpture facilities, biomass
energy production, restoration for the benefit of people
with disabilities, and a wide range of educational uses. Geoconservation and bioconservation are two of the key
objectives of many of the restoration schemes
considered.
Proper consideration of restoration management is
essential if a restoration scheme is to succeed in the
longer term. All the ALSF reports cover the ongoing
management issues, many emphasising the importance of
continuing stakeholder involvement and some highlighting
the importance of safety.
To view and download the full review "Creating
Environmental Improvements through Restoration"
please go to the Reviews & Project Reports
section of this website.
Quick-link to the review - Please note clicking
this link will open a 3-5MB PDF file.
|